I can't say I remember a whole lot from college (I went to college?). Yet, there are a few instances from inside the classroom that I do remember. One instance that sticks with me comes from an intro to Psychology class I took my sophomore year.
The professor put up a list of words covered by a sheet of paper on the overhead projector. He slowly started to scroll down the list. The list started something like:
Kind
Friendly
Giving
Loving
Outgoing
Honest
Well you get the picture. It went on like that for a little while and then he stopped for a minute. He then started listing more words. However, they were slightly different. There started to appear words like cheap, conniving, secretive (still listed like above, but I will save some space and write them this way) and the like. After he gave us the list he asked us what type of person we thought they were. It's been a while so I can't remember exactly what happened next. But if memory serves, I believe there were specific questions that we had to write down answers for. Regardless, the point is everyone concluded that the person described was a good person.
After a few minutes the professor put up another list of words. This time it began with such words as stingy, deceptive, selfish and so on. This list also changed after a while and words such as smart, gentle, lavish and the like appeared. After viewing this list everyone came to the conclusion that the person described was a bad person. Then a funny thing happened. The professor showed us both lists and they were identical. The words had just been arranged in a different order. As you can imagine the whole class was shocked.
The above events show you how much of an impact first impressions have upon people. But to me it illustrates a more important idea. When you believe something to be true, you will convince yourself it is. What happened in the class was obvious. Everyone received an initial impression and vision of who they thought this person was. Then after the words started changing people began rationalizing to themselves so that there wouldn't be this inner conflict. How could this person be both honest and dishonest, or loving and hateful? If you had the belief they were honest to begin with you would just assume that they must be acting dishonest in order to protect someone's feeling (or something along those lines). If they are loving how are they hateful? Well. Maybe they are loving in general but hateful when people hurt the ones they care about. The opposite occurred with the second list. Maybe they are dishonest most of the time, but honest when they think it serves their purpose. Of course everyone rationalizes things in a different way. But the point is that everyone came up with the same conclusion. People have difficulty changing their initial viewpoints on things even if they don't realize it. Everyone constantly rationalizes things to fit their belief structures. They use whatever evidence is presented to them that fits their beliefs, while discarding the information that doesn't fit.
Something along these lines that I've been thinking of lately is... (I've become a big fan of the ellipses since starting this blog) when does the evidence you have been receiving finally convince you that you were wrong in your original conclusions? If you think a person is good. Yet they do A, B, C, D, and E to show otherwise. Does this change your view? Or do they have to do F, G, H, I, J, and K before you realize it. I suppose some people will continually rationalize it to themselves even if you go through the alphabet and back and never accept what the evidence bears. Of course, people’s reactions depend on many variables. How strongly, and for how long they held the opinion. How open they are to new ideas, and what evidence/actions the above letters represent.